| | Main Match 3 | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:35 pm | |
| | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:38 pm | |
| IF he lists all 6 rounds up front, then do mine in this order...
1 1 1 3 3 3
If he doesn't, then do one round at a time. To clarify: if we both listed 6 rounds, then play all 6 rounds at once to speed it up, so we're not doing the "I challenge..." thing 6 times. | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:11 pm | |
| | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:43 pm | |
| | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:07 pm | |
| So, in hindsight, it would've taken less work and been less confusing to just win this match. We could've used Mets' targeting Blake, to make sure Blake doesn't win, as justification (if one of us wins, Blake can't - easy). It's really a pretty easy challenge to win with cooperation - and with enough cooperation, it doesn't matter what anyone else does (most games have variables that can screw up your own strategy, but winning this, with 3 people cooperating, would only rely on 1 variable). But I think it's worked out well enough - all cards should be gone.
Anyway, wanted to say that. Again, what I'm playing for each round:
Against Nat, rounds 1-6: 1 1 1 3 3 3
Against Switza, rounds 7-9: 3 2 2
(note that Switza and I swapped cards - I gave him a 2, he gave me a 3)
| |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:11 pm | |
| Think you got something wrong. The 3 vs 1 (Tomcat vs Adam) is probably me vs Nat. Unless Adam played a 1 when he said he only had 2s. | |
| | | Bandage Man Admin
Posts : 1733 Join date : 2015-11-15
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:18 pm | |
| i've checked. it's correct. he says he plays a 1 against you | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:21 pm | |
| Hm. OK. Nat's angry at me now because he doesn't know Switza and I swapped a number and thinks I backstabbed him. Once the results are done he should know that's not the case, though. | |
| | | Tomcat Murr
Posts : 709 Join date : 2015-11-16
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:13 pm | |
| Why was Pete calling us out? What was that about? And now Mets wants to go to the Death Match?
It would seem Switza swapped another card, which is fine - but I'm not sure why/who he was giving a point to (I guess I could look through and figure it out, but... eh).
We could've easily won that, had 2 of us protected, but instead it just became a confusing mess with none of us protected, with Pete calling Switza and me out for trading cards, and... Oh well. Not much more to say about it besides that. | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Main Match 3 | |
| |
| | | | Main Match 3 | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |